英汉翻译翻译

Comparing the variance extracted (AVE) estimates for each construct with the squared inter-construct correlations between the relevant constructs gives an indication of discriminant validity (see Table 3). The results in Table 3 show that the AVE is greater than the squared correlation estimate for each construct pair, providing additional support of discriminant validity .
Common method variance (CMV) is also assessed. A worse fit for a one-factor model with all items loading on a single construct suggests that CMV does not pose a serious threat. In this case, the one-factor test yields a χ2 of 170.6 with 90 df (pb<0.001). Obviously, the one-factor fit is much worse than the proposed measurement model (difference in χ2=60.5, df=10, pb<0.0001).

最新回答 (1条回答)

头像
匿名用户 12级
2009-04-15 回答
 比较差额提取(大道)估计每平方建设与间建设之间的关系提供了有关构建说明区分效度(见表3 ) 。结果在表3表明,该大道大于平方相关估计对每个建设,提供更多支持的区分效度。
共同方法变异病毒( CMV )也是评估。更糟适合一个因素模型加载的所有项目在一个建造表明,巨细胞病毒并不构成了严重威胁。在这种情况下,单因子试验产生χ2的170.6 90东方(以Pb计“ 0.001 ) 。显然,一个因素是适合远不如提议测量模型(差异χ2 = 60.5 ,东风= 10 ,铅“ 0.0001 ) 。